Highlight from the #scala IRC channel:
13:21 < DRMacIver> I have a somewhat unfortunate theory. I suspect the amount one cares about programming issues is inversely proportional to how inherently interesting one's work is. 13:22 < DRMacIver> Or at least negatively correlated 13:22 < ijuma> DRMacIver: is this based on personal experience? ;) 13:22 < DRMacIver> Yes 13:22 * DRMacIver finds it much harder to get worked up about language issues these days 13:23 < DRMacIver> Which is in large part because I'm doing a lot more interesting borderline computer sciencey work 13:24 < dgreensp> yeah, I do a lot of interesting work and only rarely stop to think about languages 13:24 < ijuma> yeah, I noticed. I think it makes sense. People have limited bandwidth and if work is interesting, it's likely to take quite a bit of it 13:25 < DRMacIver> I think the other issue is that people want to find what they do interesting. And so if *what* they do isn't interesting they have to become interested in *how* they do it. 13:25 < DRMacIver> But yes, the bandwidth thing is also a big part of it 13:26 < dgreensp> bandwidth minimum, bandwidth maximum :) 13:26 < DRMacIver> ? 13:27 < ijuma> DRMacIver: agreed 13:27 < dgreensp> er, the two points seemed related -- people need to be interested in something, but they can't be interested in too many things at once 13:28 < DRMacIver> Oh, right. 13:28 < DRMacIver> Yes. That's a good way of looking at it.