<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reusing Java&#8217;s tools: Cobertura and Scala</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.drmaciver.com/2008/08/reusing-javas-tools-cobertura-and-scala/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.drmaciver.com/2008/08/reusing-javas-tools-cobertura-and-scala/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 09:41:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sanket</title>
		<link>http://www.drmaciver.com/2008/08/reusing-javas-tools-cobertura-and-scala/comment-page-1/#comment-1096</link>
		<dc:creator>Sanket</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 18:22:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drmaciver.com/?p=177#comment-1096</guid>
		<description>Hi David,

This might seem to be odd... but can you comment on present pluggability of Cobertura in Scala. What do you think are the odds that integration of Cobertura( maybe modified to suite scala ) into scala would be encouraged by the community ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi David,</p>
<p>This might seem to be odd&#8230; but can you comment on present pluggability of Cobertura in Scala. What do you think are the odds that integration of Cobertura( maybe modified to suite scala ) into scala would be encouraged by the community ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
