<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New collections in Scala 2.7.2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.drmaciver.com/2008/08/new-collections-in-scala-272/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.drmaciver.com/2008/08/new-collections-in-scala-272/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 00:09:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: david</title>
		<link>http://www.drmaciver.com/2008/08/new-collections-in-scala-272/comment-page-1/#comment-416</link>
		<dc:creator>david</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 08:38:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drmaciver.com/?p=202#comment-416</guid>
		<description>Daniel:

Thanks. Glad you like them. :-)

At the moment I&#039;m mainly going to be looking at improving the implementations of different existing types of collection. I&#039;m going to put in some similar work for sets and then immutable sequences at some point in the not too distant future. Once the collections redesign is properly underway I&#039;ll probably look into adding new types, but until then I&#039;d like to hold off on it.

That being said, if you want such things, I strongly encourage you to work on them! Study the existing implementations in Java, etc, read some papers, generally have a play around. It&#039;s not really that hard, and if you don&#039;t do it because of lack of experience then you&#039;ll never acquire the experience :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daniel:</p>
<p>Thanks. Glad you like them. :-)</p>
<p>At the moment I&#8217;m mainly going to be looking at improving the implementations of different existing types of collection. I&#8217;m going to put in some similar work for sets and then immutable sequences at some point in the not too distant future. Once the collections redesign is properly underway I&#8217;ll probably look into adding new types, but until then I&#8217;d like to hold off on it.</p>
<p>That being said, if you want such things, I strongly encourage you to work on them! Study the existing implementations in Java, etc, read some papers, generally have a play around. It&#8217;s not really that hard, and if you don&#8217;t do it because of lack of experience then you&#8217;ll never acquire the experience :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.drmaciver.com/2008/08/new-collections-in-scala-272/comment-page-1/#comment-415</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 07:22:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drmaciver.com/?p=202#comment-415</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s A.W.E.S.O.M.E!

Any intentions concerning Bags and BiMaps? :-D

These would be really useful (but I haven&#039;t the experience to write that)

Cheers,
Landei</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s A.W.E.S.O.M.E!</p>
<p>Any intentions concerning Bags and BiMaps? :-D</p>
<p>These would be really useful (but I haven&#8217;t the experience to write that)</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Landei</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
